Is Lego wrong For Refusing To sell To Ai Weiwei?

Artist Ai Weiwei views Lego’s refusal to sell him a bulk order of its bricks as an “act of censorship and discrimination.”

October 27, 2015

In an October 21 Instagram publish, artist Ai Weiwei revealed that Lego refused to promote him a bulk order of bricks for a forthcoming set up on the nationwide Gallery of Victoria, in Melbourne, Australia, on political grounds. The question: are Lego’s explanations about “censorship,” as Ai alleges? Are they a cop out from a company looking to cover its ass? Or are they a couple of toy firm that simply wants to keep its focus squarely on making toys?

“As a company dedicated to handing over great inventive play experiences to kids, we refrain—on a worldwide level—from actively attractive in or endorsing using Lego bricks in initiatives or contexts of a political agenda,” Lego spokesperson Roar rude Trangbaek told Co.Design via e mail. “In circumstances the place we receive requests for donations or reinforce for projects—corresponding to the potential of purchasing Lego bricks in very huge quantities, which is not conceivable through normal gross sales channels—the place we’re made conscious that there is a political context, we due to this fact kindly decline enhance.”

in the October 21 submit, Ai additionally mentioned that Lego and the chinese language government recently signed a deal to open a $300 million Legoland theme park in Shanghai, implying a connection with his bulk order going unfulfilled. In an October 25 Instagram publish, Ai wrote: “Lego’s refusal to promote its product to the artist is an act of censorship and discrimination.”

Trangbaek talked about that whereas Lego can refuse to fill bulk orders at its discretion, that it can be no longer outright banning the sales to any particular person or entity.

“We recognize any folks’ right to free inventive expression, and we don’t censor, restrict or ban ingenious use of Lego bricks,” he stated. (Co.Design has coated many creative initiatives that use Lego as a topic or medium.) So any individual who desires to make use of Lego bricks can accomplish that, but they will have to buy them like every paying purchaser.

Ai’s set up will raise a message of free speech. in terms of the use of Lego bricks, although, it appears will come at a value.

“Any individual person can naturally buy Lego bricks thru customary sales channels or get access to Lego bricks in different ways to create their Lego projects if they desire to take action, but as a company, we select to chorus from actively enticing in these actions—via as an example bulk buy.” Lego declined to touch upon the cost difference between retail and bulk orders.

Trangbaek says that this coverage has been around for many years and as CNN studies, the company has tried to eliminate itself from any form of political messaging, from disputes between Royal Dutch Shell (with which Lego had a promotional contract) and Greenpeace to blocking off an idea to create a Supreme courtroom–themed set under a “no politics or political symbols” rule.

it’s price noting that Ai distinctive Lego bricks for his @massive installation, which seemed on Alcatraz from September 2014 through April 2015. hint, a section appearing in the express, was composed of 1.2 million bricks, which the convey’s organizer, FOR-web site, acquired for the artist. in this scenario, FOR-site requested for an in-variety donation (not to fill a bulk order as within the case of the Australian exhibit) and there used to be no formal discover from the company place of work declining to fill the donation. in fact, there was no response from the company place of job at all. Alison Konecki, development & outreach associate at FOR-website online, issued the next statement:

in the early levels of developing Ai Weiwei’s @massive installation, hint, which utilized 1.2 million Lego bricks, FOR-web site foundation contacted Lego’s corporate headquarters in Denmark with a request for an in-sort donation of materials. We didn’t receive a response, and due to this fact reached out to a number of departments at U.S.-based totally Lego methods Inc. with the same request, explaining that we had been looking for Lego bricks for a challenge with artist and activist Ai Weiwei exploring freedom of expression and person accountability. despite the fact that our request for beef up used to be declined, we have been said individuals of the Lego U.S. sales and customer service staff who facilitated the transactions for numerous bulk orders shipped both to us and right away to the studio in Beijing for the undertaking.

When requested in regards to the @huge set up, Trangbaek replied: “we do not touch upon our communicate with partners, shoppers, customers, or different stakeholders.”

Judging from the hundreds of feedback on Ai’s images voicing toughen, a least a big slice of the general public seems to have sided with his stance. then again, Guardian critic Jonathan Jonas writes that: “i’m stunned that someone who has experienced what it’s to be oppressed with the aid of an authoritarian regime…can be so glib as to confuse a careless PR transfer with exact ‘censorship.'”

yes, the refusal to “actively” sell a bulk order to Ai is a silly, backwards policy. however censorship?

Ai has due to the fact began a marketing campaign to shield the freedom of political art, which contains second-hand BMW 5S series sedans on the way to grow to be assortment points for Lego bricks. The donations have already begun.

corporations like Etsy, Starbucks, and Dove have integrated “do excellent” social initiatives as part of their messaging—some more a hit than others.

Free speech looks like a no brainer result in to give a boost to nowadays, but as an organization, Lego has the discretion to fortify—or no longer strengthen—what it pleases. possibly a greater answer shifting forward would merely be to open up bulk ordering for everybody who’s prepared to pay.

practice @aiww on Instagram for updates.

associated: A historical past Of Lego’s Toy trade Dominance In three Minutes

[top photograph: Flickr consumer sprout_labs]

fast company , read Full Story

(85)