In a separate case in New York, Apple is already awaiting a ruling about unlocking an iPhone for the police, as authorities continue to insist encryption is standing in their way. On the other side of the argument, tech companies, privacy advocates and regular end users are arguing that any kind of intentional backdoor access is too big of a risk. Back in 2013, reports said Apple could, and did, unlock iPhones upon law enforcement’s request, and it remains to be seen if they can or will return to that state. Apple has five days to respond to the request, we have contacted the company and will update this post if we receive a response.

Update: Apple has responded, with a lengthy letter on its website both insisting on the need for encryption to keep is customers’ data safe, and saying that it will not help the FBI by creating a version of iOS with a weakness or backdoor. The company plans to oppose the judge’s order and the FBI’s demands “with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country.” When it does so, it will also have the support of the EFF, which has signaled its intent to file an amicus brief in support of Apple.