Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned July 2, 2020

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
Basecamp CEO says Apple App Store issue is about ‘absence of choice’
<> Embed @  Email Report

Basecamp CEO says Apple App Store issue is about ‘absence of choice’

Mariella Moon, @mariella_moon

June 20, 2020
 
 

Basecamp CEO Jason Fried has written an open letter explaining what his real problem is with Apple’s App Store payment policies. He said it’s not just about the money — though he admits that it’s “a large part of the story” — but “about the absence of choice and how Apple forcibly inserts themselves between [the] company and [its] customer.”

Here’s a little background on what prompted his open letter: Basecamp recently released a multi-platform email service called “Hey,” which costs at least $99 a year. To be able to use it, you’ll have to pay for subscription on the web. That didn’t sit well with the tech giant, which rejected a bug fix the company tried to roll out shortly after Hey’s launch. In a letter Apple sent to Basecamp after rejecting an appeal to its decision, it said developers must offer in-app purchasing as a way for customers to unlock features and functionality.

As you may know, Apple takes a 30 percent commission on paid apps and any in-app purchase. It’s no secret that a lot of developers aren’t happy with the term — the European Commission is even opening dual investigations into the App Store and Apple Pay due to complaints filed by Spotify and, based on reports, Rakuten-owned e-reader app Kobo. Spotify chief Daniel Ek revealed long ago that the company can’t afford Apple’s fees. And after the EC announced its probe, Tinder’s parent company Match Group and Fortnite owner Epic Games also criticized the tech giant for collecting a portion of their earnings.

Apple said it will only roll out the bug fix Basecamp tried to submit if it revises the Hey email app. In an interview with TechCrunch, the tech giant’s Senior Vice President Phil Schiller said the company has no plans to change its policies to accommodate the developer. In fact, Schiller said the Hey iOS app was approved in error. He also said that Basecamp could have made the Hey app acceptable under current rules through different ways, such as charging different prices in the app and on the web. Fried called that statement “antitrust gold” in his letter, since that presumably suggests that Basecamp should charge its iOS customers more.

The CEO also expounded on what he meant by “absence of choice.” He said that if Hey’s customers sign up through the App Store, Basecamp will no longer be able to offer “refunds, credit card changes, discounts, trial extensions, hardship exceptions, comps, partial payments, non-profit discounts, educational discounts, downtime credits, tax exceptions, etc.” It can’t extend trials or payment terms for those who need it like it does for its project management software customers, for instance. Or offer free versions to people like first responders.

Further, it won’t be able to transfer payment information from one platform to another. If a customer suddenly has to switch platforms from iOS to Android, then they may end up losing access to their email address and everything in their inbox. “This is why we have a universal, non-platform-specific centralized billing system,” he wrote. Fried ended his letter with this:

“So what do we want? I’m not saying IAP shouldn’t exist, or shouldn’t be an option. For some businesses, it might make sense. If Apple is sending you all your customers, it probably does make sense. The 30% rate is still highway robbery, as Congressman Cicilline recently said in an interview, but the fundamental problem for us is the lack of choice.

Apple, please just give your developers the choice! Let us bill our own customers through our own systems, so we can help them with extensions, refunds, discounts, or whatever else our own way. It’s our business, not your business. And Phil Schiller’s suggestion that we should raise prices on iOS customers to make up for Apple’s added margin is antitrust gold.”

Engadget RSS Feed

(31)