specialists Skeptical North Korea Hacked Sony

A refrain of cyber specialists question the FBI’s evidence. The FBI declared final Friday that the North Korean government was once chargeable for hacking Sony—but for a lot of security specialists and hackers, the case is a ways from closed.  

A refrain of cyber consultants query the FBI’s proof.
The FBI declared final Friday that the North Korean govt was responsible for hacking Sony—but for a lot of security specialists and hackers, the case is a ways from closed. “It was an act of cybervandalism,” President Obama informed CNN, refusing to categorize the attack as an act of cyberwar at the same time as he joined the FBI in laying blame on the ft of Kim Jong-un, the totalitarian state’s “supreme leader.” yet regardless of that authentic conclusion, voices questioning the FBI’s evidence have grown louder. Some specialists have pointed to flaws within the FBI’s technical reasoning:  

On its face the proof shows best that this assault has characteristics of prior attacks attributed to North Korea. we know nothing in regards to the attribution veracity of these prior attacks. way more importantly, it is at least imaginable that any other nation is spoofing a North Korean assault. For if the us knows the characteristics or signatures of prior North Korean attacks, then so too would possibly some third united states that might use these characteristics or signatures.

And technical information:

The IP handle is rarely what’s interesting. It’s what’s working on the gadget that has that IP tackle that is fascinating. moreover, to suggest that some addresses are everlasting fixtures utilized by North Korean hackers implies a elementary misunderstanding of how the internet works and particularly how hackers function.

whereas others pointed to the “North Korean Hacking team’s” use of language as suspect:

1. The damaged English seems intentionally unhealthy and doesn’t showcase any of the traditional comprehension mistakes you if truth be told are expecting to peer in “Konglish,” i.e., it reads to me like an English speaker pretending to be dangerous at writing English. 2. the truth that the code was written on a computer with Korean locale & language in fact makes it much less more likely to be North Korea. no longer least because they don’t discuss traditional “Korean” in North Korea, they discuss their own dialect and conventional Korean is forbidden.

Plus, there’s the pesky query as to why the hackers didn’t mention The Interview until press coverage mentioned a conceivable connection between the assault and the movie’s upcoming release. It seems the proof released to date is mostly circumstantial. so far, the FBI has yet to unlock additional info beyond the transient statement it revealed ultimate week. North Korea, by way of United nations diplomat Kim tune, continues to disclaim that it performed a job in the hacking fracas. In a symbolic gesture of anger, the u . s . nowadays refused to attend a security Council meeting alongside the united states in protest over the FBI’s accusations. On the agenda: North Korea’s human rights report, together with its brutal device of political jail camps. [h/t: Gawker]

[picture: Flickr consumer Uri excursions]

  fast company, learn Full Story

(136)