Pinned 1 min ago

<> Embed

@  Email


Uploaded by user
House passes contentious anti-online sex trafficking bill
<> Embed @  Email Report

House passes contentious anti-online sex trafficking bill

Mariella Moon, @mariella_moon

February 27, 2018
House passes contentious anti-online sex trafficking bill |
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call

Sex-trafficking victims, prosecutors and state attorneys will be able to sue websites that host ads and content linked to the sex trade under the bill the House has just approved. The bill called “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” or FOSTA seeks to amend Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects websites from lawsuits over user-generated posts. It was filed by Rep. Ann Wagner (pictured above) to target websites like Backpage, which hosts sex and child trafficking ads. Previous investigations have revealed that Backpage went as far as editing posters’ ads — it replaced words in ads trafficking minors with terms like “fresh,” for instance — to conceal evidence from law enforcement.

However, since the bill’s terms would apply to all websites and not just to shady directories, the tech industry is divided on the issue. The Internet Association, IBM, Oracle and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are for it. Facebook, as well, with COO Sheryl Sandberg voicing support for the bill on her page (March 08, 2018). “Facebook is committed to working with… legislators in the House and Senate as the process moves forward to make sure we pass meaningful and strong legislation to stop sex trafficking,” she wrote.

Google and groups like the EFF make up the opposition, warning the government that the bill would drastically change the Communications Decency Act, which allowed the internet to flourish. The Electronic Frontier Foundation said it will lead to platforms policing user speech. After all, if they don’t screen their users’ posts, then they could get sued left and right. That means smaller websites and non-profit orgs that don’t have the means to moderate every post are the most at risk. “The tragedy,” according to the EFF, “is that FOSTA isn’t needed to prosecute or sue sex traffickers.” Backpage is reportedly under federal investigation even though it has cited CDA in the past.

Within the government, though, the bill seems to be enjoying support from both political parties and from various authorities. Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. told The Washington Post: “The ability to hold websites criminally liable for facilitating sex trafficking or the exploitation of children would be transformative in the fight against human trafficking. I thank Congresswoman Wagner for her steadfast dedication to protecting trafficking victims.”

The bill is now on its way to the Senate, which has already passed a similar bill called Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act or SESTA last year.

Coverage: EFF, Politico


Pinned onto