New report says Trump’s ballroom will ruin the aesthetic of the White House, but he can build it anyway
Hunter Schwarz
he replaced the ballroom’s original architecture firm, McCrery Architects, with a new one called Shalom Baranes Associates.
The switch came following reports that Trump and McCrery Architects CEO Jim McCrery II disagreed over the planned size of the new building. McCrery reportedly believed Trump’s plans for a 90,000-square-foot ballroom would dwarf the 55,000-square-foot building of the main White House mansion.
Trump has inflated the estimated cost and size of the planned ballroom over time, and initially said it wouldn’t interfere with the East Wing.
In July, the White House announced its intention for a building that would seat 650 people, at an estimated cost of $ 200 million. The current plan is to have a complex with space to seat around 1,000 people, which Trump said on Wednesday would now cost $ 400 million. The White House says private donors are paying for construction costs.
Preservationists file lawsuit to pause construction
The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a lawsuit on December 12, accusing Trump of breaking the law by moving ahead with the East Wing teardown and plans for a new ballroom without public input or any sort of independent review.
The National Trust said that Trump should have submitted his plans to Congress and the National Capital Planning Commission, and the group asked the court to put a pause on construction.
“No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever—not President Trump, not President Biden, and not anyone else,” the lawsuit reads. “And no president is legally allowed to construct a ballroom on public property without giving the public the opportunity to weigh in.”
In a court filing on December 15, the Trump administration claimed construction must continue for unnamed national security reasons. Attorneys for the administration said the National Capital Planning Commission and the congressional Commission of Fine Arts will review Trump’s plans “without this Court’s involvement.”
A judge on December 16 ruled that construction could move ahead after it rejected the National Trust’s request to temporarily halt the project.
NPS weighs in
An NPS environmental assessment published December 15 estimated Trump’s plans for a 90,000-square-foot building with seating for more than 1,000 people would be completed by Trump’s final summer in office, in 2028. It also said the building would adversely effect the cultural landscape of the White House grounds.
The report notes the imbalance of a ballroom that is bigger than the rest of the White House and features a two-story East Colonnade. “The new building’s larger footprint and height will dominate the eastern portion of the site, creating a visual imbalance with the more modestly scaled West Wing and Executive Mansion,” it says. “These changes will adversely alter the design, setting, and feeling of the White House and the grounds over the long term.”
The assessment also notes that the construction will introduce temporary risks to the rest of the White House due to matters such as noise and vibration.
Regardless of the report’s findings, it concludes that the planned building would meet the needs of providing a permanent, secure event space on the White House grounds, and that it doesn’t rise to the level of needing an environmental impact statement to be prepared.
(1)
