Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned August 19, 2018

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
Senators grill Google over rumored China search engine
<> Embed @  Email Report

Senators grill Google over rumored China search engine

Mariella Moon, @mariella_moon

August 05, 2018
 
 

Senators grill Google over rumored China search engine | DeviceDaily.com

 
 
 
 

Google refused to confirm if it’s truly been developing a censored search engine for China after reports about the project’s existence came out, but it might soon have no choice but to come clean. A group of six Democratic and Republican Senators led by Marco Rubio has penned a letter addressed to Google chief Sundar Pichai demanding concrete answers. They want to know once and for all whether the tech giant is conjuring up a version of its search engine that’ll work behind the Great Firewall. The Senators called the move “deeply troubling” if true, pointing out that that it “risks making Google complicit in human rights abuses related to China’s rigorous censorship regime.”

While the company has yet to confirm the project (reportedly called “Dragonfly”), it’s easy to see why the Senators would be concerned. Based on The Intercept’s description of the restricted search engine, it will be able to automatically identify and remove websites blocked by China’s firewall from the results page. Google used to do something similar for its Chinese homepage within the mainland. Back in 2010, though, it ultimately stopped censoring results following a cyberattack that compromised the Gmail accounts of dozens of Chinese human rights activists. It’s been largely absent from the market since then.

Rubio and the five other lawmakers want to know what had changed over the past eight years to make Google “comfortable cooperating with the rigorous censorship regime in China.” They explained that the project (again, if it actually exists) sets a worrying precedent. After all, if the country’s government can force the biggest search engine in the world to comply with its censorship requirements, then smaller entities would have a hard time entering the market without compromising their values.

The Senators also want to know whether Google plans to require its employees to attend mandatory trainings on “Marxist news values,” since that’s a requirement for companies that run online news services in China. Another question Rubio wants answered is whether Google will turn over users’ search histories if the country’s government demands it. As a final dig at the tech giant, they’re asking for any other info it can share to prove that it can reconcile this move with its “Don’t be evil” motto. It’s worth noting, however, that Google already scrubbed that part from its code of conduct in April.

Engadget RSS Feed

(22)