The best baby monitors for your home nursery
The best baby monitors for your home nursery
From impeccably clear video to pairing with smart wearables, there are a lot of features to consider.
There is nothing more disorienting or surreal than bringing home your first baby. It’s a heady combination of critical responsibility and an uneasy panic of not having any idea what you’re doing. There’s a picture of me with my son asleep on my chest on the first night he came home and my expression reads what do we do now? Having a monitor that I could check frequently while the twins slept helped me relax in those early days, and it’s still part of our nighttime routine.
Initially we used a combination of Owlet’s smart socks and an audio-only monitor, which kept me from sneaking into their room throughout the night to check on them. But there are a lot of options for baby monitors these days. So I’ve spent the last several weeks testing a variety of smart video-enabled models and strapping wearables onto the twins to see what the hardware is capable of, and what features the software offers.
What to look for in a baby monitor
When I needed a baby monitor, I basically snagged the first halfway decent audio-only device that had good reviews on Amazon. I didn’t stop to think about what I actually needed from the device, where I wanted to put it, or what features made sense for my needs. So I didn’t wind up all that satisfied with the purchase, even though the device works fine.
That said, there are still plenty of audio-only monitors being sold. The feature set is usually pretty small, so narrowing down a decision is a little easier in this case. The variations are basically range, battery versus AC power, lights, and controls. Video and smart monitors each have a lot more to offer, with more features and options for you to choose from.
It’s worth taking a few moments to make sure you know where you’re putting the camera, if you want to wall mount, crib mount or use on a base, and where the nearest power source is. Also consider how you want to use it: Do you want to use your smartphone or have a dedicated display? Pair with a wearable device? Share with another caregiver? Ensure a secure video feed? What are the most important features to you? A high-def video feed? Background audio? Motion alerts?
Most of the devices I tested offered a solid combination of features, but none of them offered everything. For example, the Owlet and Nanit cameras offer background audio which will play over a lock screen or open apps so if your kiddo starts to fuss you’ll still hear them. That’s pretty useful since you’re going to want to keep tabs on what’s happening in the nursery even if you’re doing other things on your phone. And while most of these devices also provide sound and motion alerts, it’s also important to have an ability to customize the notifications, or even shut off the camera entirely, since you don’t need your phone pinging you about noise when you’re in the nursery trying to soothe a child. Features like two-way audio could be useful for parents who want to verbally reassure a child or sing a lullaby from a distance, but maybe aren’t the highest priority for those who are co-sleeping.
Best overall: Nanit Pro
The Nanit Pro isn’t the only camera I tested that has 1080p HD video, but it’s the one that immediately impressed both my partner and I. The streaming video from the birds-eye view Nanit camera was incredibly clear, even in night vision mode. The Nanit camera is a flat disc that can be mounted to a wall behind a crib or be used free standing. I opted for the latter and I have to say, I intensely dislike the stand. I never felt like I was assembling it correctly even though it comes half-assembled with the charging cable strung through the stand poles. It should be fairly impossible to take a wrong turn here, since all you need to do is screw the contraption together. But it felt flimsy when assembled, and I had to adjust it so it leaned against the crib for support.
Buy Nanit Pro at Amazon – $299
Assembly issues aside, the camera and app were great. Because the camera is set at a bird’s eye view I never had to worry much about adjusting it. It consistently provided a clear picture, loaded quickly and was otherwise flawless. However, that bird’s eye view also means the Nanit is intended for one child and one crib at a time. The app does make it easy to add a second camera, and you can bundle products together on the Nanit site but you’ll still need a camera for each kid.
The app is well organized and the various settings were easy to find. I particularly liked the Memory feature that provided me with a recap of my daughter’s night activities. But the app sends out a lot of notifications — movement or sound detection alerts — and since the microphone is loud enough to pick up my kids screaming from downstairs, these became a bit aggravating.
Fortunately, these can be minimized or turned off in the settings, and there’s an option to disable the camera entirely from the app. Most of these features are part of the Nanit Insights program, which comes free for one year with a Nanit Pro purchase but thereafter costs $50 a year, or $5 a month. Nanit has three tiers of the Insights platform; without it you lose many of its most valuable features. Nanit’s subscription features also permits multiple users to access a camera feed — up to 50 people, in fact, which seems like a lot of folks watching your baby — but that will cost you $300 a year or $30 a month.
The Nanit pairs with its own wearables, either a Breathing Band — which comes with the Nanit Pro or can be purchased separately for $20 — to measure baby’s breaths per minute or with the Smart Sheets, which estimate your child’s height and track growth. The Breathing Band is a patterned band that wraps around your child’s midsection; there’s also a swaddle and a sleeping bag version. It was easy enough to put on, though my 13-month old daughter immediately began to tug and pull at it.
The band worked fine every time I used it, though obviously if it shifts while a child sleeps the results can be affected. However, unlike the Owlet (which measures pulse ox and heart rate) the Breathing Band is a single-function device. Likewise, the $35 Smart Sheets worked as advertised: The app finds the patterns in the corner of the sheets and you help it triangulate points on your baby from a photo of them on their back. The app works the rest out for you. I’d been curious about how tall the twins had gotten so this was neat to be able to test out but again, it’s a single feature add-on so you’ll have to decide if it’s worth it to you to include.
Best monitor with a wearable: Owlet Cam
Owlet’s $149 Cam provides parents and caretakers with a 1080p HD video feed and night vision courtesy of a 130-degree wide-angle lens. The Cam can sit on its own base or be wall mounted (but not crib mounted) and has to be manually tilted or adjusted. It features two-way audio and sound/motion notifications as well as background audio that will play over other apps so you’ll still hear your little one murmuring even if you’re checking email.
Buy Owlet Cam at Amazon – $149
The video feed is displayed via the Owlet app, which also displays the data from the company’s $299 smart Sock when can be used alongside the Cam. This provides a video feed, room temperature and the baby’s heart rate and pulse ox data all in one place. Up to five people can stream footage at one time as long as you’ve provided them with your account credentials. When I added the Cam to my Owlet app, it automatically showed up on my partner’s Android phone. Owlet uses AES 128-bit encryption and a TLS connection to WiFi for security and because it should be connected to your own private network, Owlet claims the system is safer than analog monitors.
I ran into a few hiccups setting up the Cam; nothing drastic and nothing hard to resolve, but it’s worth noting this has happened with every Owlet device I’ve used. The video feed worked well at giving me a clear view of my daughter’s crib, both during the day in color and after hours using the night vision. However, the Cam won’t register multiple babies, so it couldn’t be used simultaneously for my son as well even if I could position it where it could view both babies.
That being said, Owlet does make it fairly easy to add additional children or devices to the app. I did really like getting the feed and the sock data all in one place, and I appreciated being able to toggle off the notifications even if I couldn’t turn the camera off entirely. However, I missed the time-lapse clips offered by other devices like the Lumi or the Nanit, and I wish I could add all my tracking data — like diaper changes and feeds — to the app as well.
Best for multiple users or caretakers: Pampers Lumi
The Lumi is an “integrated sleep system” from Pampers. What that actually boils down to is a 1080p high-definition camera paired with a wearable that goes on your child’s diaper to automatically track wet nappies, changes and sleep courtesy of a smartphone app. First, let’s talk about the camera. It’s a small device that can be swiveled manually to adjust the 180-degree view or pointed downward for privacy. It can be wall mounted or used sitting on its base, but I wouldn’t recommend trying to crib mount it as your little one will be tempted to grab at it.
Buy Pampers Lumi at Amazon – $299
The Lumi camera also has two-way audio and background audio, as well as room temperature sensors, but does not send sound or motion notifications. The video feed can be shared with up to four people, and you can control how much access they have all as part of the standard Lumi features. The feed connects using WiFi and offers encryption for security, which should keep anyone who doesn’t have permissions from viewing the video. However, there doesn’t appear to be a way to add more than one camera, sensor or child to the app.
The picture is very clear both during the day, where it’s displayed in color, and after bedtime in night vision mode. The first camera that Pampers sent wouldn’t work no matter what I tried, but the second unit I tried powered up and synced easily. Since then, there have been a few instances when the camera wouldn’t connect to the app for a few minutes, but I’m chalking that up to my iffy satellite internet service.
The app is well organized and displays information clearly, but you have to manually enter in feeds or miss out on that data. I particularly liked the Lookback feature, which played a short time-lapse clip of my baby’s activity over the previous six to 15 hours. The Lookback clips can be downloaded but not saved to the app.
The Lumi wearable is a slim, egg-shaped device. The rear side is flat and has velcro to adhere it to the front of a diaper. There’s also a small red blinking light, which is the sensor that measures the diaper density to report on how wet your child is. The device doesn’t require any recharging, but only has a life-span of three months. Lumi sells Pamper’s diapers to be used specifically with the sensor; they feature a dotted line to indicate placement. However, I tried using regular diapers (also Pampers) and the sensor had no trouble performing as expected. I also tried placing it slightly off-center from the marked lines and it still worked fine.
Although it only measures wet diapers, diaper changes and sleep patterns, I found it especially useful for the later — automatically tracking my toddler’s sleep habits is something I wish my other wearable (the Owlet sock) would do as well. The sensor never moved or dislodged from my kid’s diapers but, because it weighs almost nothing, it’s also incredibly easy to misplace. I lost mine entirely during a trip to the pediatrician’s office, which actually bummed me out because I was really enjoying using it.
Best for security: Infant Optics DXR-8 Pro
If security is a top priority, the $199 DXR-8 Pro from Infant Optics is a solid choice. It uses a self-contained, closed-loop system instead of WiFi so no one can hack into it. Another bonus: If, like me, you live somewhere with patchy internet, this won’t drain your bandwidth.
Buy Infant Optics DXR-8 Pro at Amazon – $199
The camera records in 720p and displays on an included 5-inch high-definition LCD display. The DXR-8 Pro includes an interchangeable lens and an extra charging cable so the display can be plugged into either a wall outlet or a USB input. From the screen, you can pan and tilt remotely as well as zoom in to see your baby better. The pan and tilt range was good enough for me to swivel between both my kids’ cribs and, as advertised, the zoom gets you close enough so that you can see your baby breathing (though just barely).
The camera also has an active noise reduction feature that filters out background noise to better isolate sounds from your baby. (However, this might need to be disabled if you’re using a white noise machine.) It has night vision and a thermometer so it can display room temperatures. And it can be expanded to include up to four cameras. I also liked that both the camera and the display could be completely turned off .
The DXR-8 Pro isn’t a good choice for those who don’t want to keep track of an additional display, or remember to charge another device. I was able to get roughly a night and a half out of each charge, but more than once I realized I’d forgotten to charge it. It doesn’t have an app, or any sharing features like the Lumi or Owlet. You can’t track data, record time lapses or share the feed. And because it sits on its own stand, it doesn’t have bird’s eye views and can’t be wall mounted, so you’ll need to have a dedicated space for it to sit somewhere.
Although I didn’t test them myself for this article, in the past we’ve reviewed both Eufy and Project Nursery monitors with similar features to the Infant Optics camera. Daniel Cooper liked the Eufy monitor with a wide-angle lens because of its closed-circuit system, 5” display and features. It can pan 330 degrees and tilt 110 degrees to provide full room coverage. You can also connect up to four cameras to one display, and wall mount for better positioning. The Eufy has two-way audio, a temperature sensor and a lullaby player but only 720p resolution. It also has a reasonable price tag compared to some of the smart(er) monitors.
Buy Eufy baby monitor at Amazon – $160
Project Nursery also offers a 5” closed-circuit camera system, which Daniel reviewed a few years ago. Much like the Eufy unit and the Infant Optics system, the Project Nursery is smart-ish in that it doesn’t require a WiFi connection and doesn’t have an app. Instead you get a micro-USB powered camera with remote pan and tilt and night vision, a 5” display and a 1.5” mini display that can be worn like a smart watch. While Daniel didn’t find that mini monitor quite as helpful, the simplicity of a non-WiFi connected camera appealed to him as it made for an easy set up and straightforward operation. The Project Nursery camera can also play lullabies or white noise, record video, take still photos and has sound, motion and temperature alerts.
Buy Smart baby monitor at Project Nursery – $150
Lastly, I’ll give a quick shout-out here to the Cubo AI, which mostly had an impressively clear and crisp video feed. Much like the Nanit, it consists of a camera that can be crib or wall mounted, and uses AI to detect if baby’s face is covered. It can also be used as a “toddler cam” to alert you when your little one has ventured into areas they shouldn’t be.
Though the Cubo AI initially worked during set up, it couldn’t refresh the feed or provide me with a consistent view of my daugher’s crib. This is almost certainly due to my laggy satellite internet connection which can’t quite hit the speeds required by the device — understandable but worth noting if you also live in an area without high-speed. I was looking forward to testing out the alerts and sleep notifications, but it looks like that will have to wait until we finish moving to an area with better bandwidth. Once I can finish the testing, I’ll update this guide with additional details on Cubo AI’s monitor.
Buy Cubo AI Plus at Cubo – $299
This article originally stated that the Nanit Breathing Band is $40; the Breathing Band is $20 or $40 for three. We have corrected the article.