Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned April 9, 2019

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
Twitter may label notable tweets that violate its terms
<> Embed @  Email Report

Twitter may label notable tweets that violate its terms

Kris Holt, @krisholt

March 28, 2019
 

Twitter may label notable tweets that violate its terms | DeviceDaily.com

 
 

Twitter is considering a label for tweets that violate its rules but believes should remain on the platform because they’re in the public interest. Twitter’s head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde said in a Washington Post interview such a label could “put some context around [a tweet] so people are aware that that content is actually a violation of our rules and it is serving a particular purpose in remaining on the platform.”

There’s a newsworthiness exemption in Twitter’s rules. It allows tweets from world leaders and tweets it deems notable enough to stay on the platform when they’d be removed in other circumstances. The label that’s being mooted would help make it clear why such tweets are still visible. A Twitter spokesperson confirmed to Engadget the company is looking at ways to offer more context around newsworthy tweets that break the rules.

There’s no “blanket exception” for anyone, however, and Gadde affirmed that Twitter will still take down tweets that cross a line. “An example would be a direct violent threat against an individual that we wouldn’t leave on the platform because of the danger it poses to that individual,” she said. Gadde also noted Twitter may limit the visibility of “dehumanizing” tweets — such content may still be available, though you might have to click through a warning label to see it.

Twitter has tested several features in recent months to improve context on the platform. It trialed a label to denote the person who posted the first tweet in a thread, for instance. It’s also testing ways to subscribe to conversations (so you can follow them without directly engaging with likes or replies) and nested, color-coded threads.

Engadget RSS Feed

(31)